EPI9-6: THE QUALITY OF MEASUREMENTS: Precision Or Random Variation And Bias Or Systematic Variation

OBJECTIVES

At the end of this session you should be able to critically interpret findings in the literature.

CHECKLIST FOR CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES:

Title - appropriate.

Abstract/summary - adequate and not misleading.

Literature review - adequacy, appropriate and relevant research problem.

Motivation

Aim -Concisely stated.

Objectives - attainable and precisely defined, do they relate to aim?

Methods

Results:

Discussion

CRITICAL APPRAISAL / CAUSAL ANALYSIS - SHORT CHECKLIST:

Application of rules of evidence to a study to assess the validity of the data, completeness of reporting, methods and procedures, conclusions, compliance with ethical standards, and so forth. The questions below are sequential.

  1. What were the findings?
  2. Are the findings internally valid?
    1. Are there non-causal explanations?
    2. Are there causal explanations?
  3. Are the findings externally valid?
  4. Was the study ethical?
1. What were the findings?
2. Are the findings internally valid?
  1. Are there non-causal explanations?
  2. Are there causal explanations?

    C.A.U.S.E.R.:

3. Are the findings externally valid?

Do they apply to:

4. Was the study ethical?

Internal and external ethics:




Creative Commons 

License
General Introduction to Occupational Health: Occupational Hygiene, Epidemiology & Biostatistics by Prof Jonny Myers is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 South Africa License
.